censors

简明释义

英[ˈsensəz]美[ˈsensərz]

监察官

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The film was given a 15 rating by British censors.

英国审查员将这部电影定为15岁以上级。

2.The reaction of groups and individuals, often through the Internet, also provides a striking illustration of the emergence of true public opinion in China, unmediated by the official press or censors.

一些群众和个人在网上公布了那些灭狗的最真实的照片及数据，准备给官方实施压力。

3.He conscientiously sat through the movies which it was one of his official duties to censors.

他尽责地从头到尾不离席地看宛那些他职责上必检查的影片。

4.But the system is not infallible, and inernet users frequently find ways to skirt the censors.

可译为：但这套体系也非绝对可靠，互联网用户经常能找到办法绕开监管。

5.In real life this is also the example of the censors also enforce love.

现实生活也有这样的例子，古惑仔也有古惑仔的爱情。

6.The film had to be cut before the board of censors accepted it.

该电影得先进行剪切，才能得到审查委员会的认可。

7.The censors' role has changed from the traditional one-way circulator and information controller into the new information manager, whose role covers circulation and receival, adjustment and reform.

“把关人”已由传统的单向传播与控制信息向多元角色转换，成为集传播与接受、调整与变革为一体的新型网络信息调控者。

8.In some countries, censors 审查员 restrict access to certain websites.

在一些国家，审查员 censors 限制对某些网站的访问。

9.The film was heavily edited by censors 审查员 before its release.

这部电影在发布之前被审查员 censors 大幅编辑。

10.The government often employs censors 审查员 to monitor media content.

政府经常雇用审查员 censors 来监控媒体内容。

11.Many authors fear that censors 审查员 will alter their original messages.

许多作者担心审查员 censors 会改变他们原本的信息。

12.The censors 审查员 removed all scenes of violence from the movie.

审查员删除了电影中所有暴力场景。

作文

In the age of information, the role of censors (审查者) has become increasingly significant. These individuals or organizations are tasked with reviewing and controlling the flow of information to the public. While some argue that censors (审查者) are necessary to protect society from harmful content, others believe that their actions can lead to a suppression of free speech and creativity. This tension between safety and freedom is at the heart of many debates surrounding media and communication today.Historically, censors (审查者) have existed in various forms across different cultures. In ancient Rome, for example, the position of censor was crucial for maintaining moral standards among citizens. They were responsible for overseeing public morals and could even expel senators who did not meet these standards. Fast forward to modern times, and we see censors (审查者) operating in governments, schools, and corporations, each with their own set of guidelines and criteria for what constitutes acceptable content.The internet has further complicated the landscape of censorship. With the rise of social media platforms, the power of censors (审查者) has shifted. Companies like Facebook and Twitter employ their own teams of censors (审查者) to monitor user-generated content, often leading to accusations of bias and inconsistency. For instance, a post that is deemed inappropriate by one censor (审查者) may be allowed by another, creating confusion and frustration among users. This inconsistency raises important questions about who gets to decide what is acceptable in public discourse.Furthermore, the impact of censors (审查者) extends beyond just individual posts. It shapes the overall narrative that society engages with. When certain topics are consistently suppressed, it can create an environment where critical discussions are stifled. This is particularly evident in authoritarian regimes, where censors (审查者) control media outlets to ensure that only government-approved messages are disseminated. The result is a populace that is uninformed and unable to engage in meaningful dialogue about pressing issues.On the other hand, proponents of censorship argue that censors (审查者) serve a vital role in protecting individuals from harmful or misleading information. In situations involving hate speech, misinformation, or graphic content, censors (审查者) can act as guardians of public safety. For example, during a public health crisis, censors (审查者) may work to remove false information that could endanger lives. Thus, the challenge lies in finding a balance between maintaining freedom of expression and ensuring public safety.In conclusion, the role of censors (审查者) in our society is complex and multifaceted. As we navigate through an ever-evolving media landscape, it is essential to critically examine the implications of censorship on our freedoms and societal norms. While censors (审查者) can serve a protective function, we must remain vigilant about the potential for abuse and the importance of open dialogue. Ultimately, fostering an informed and engaged citizenry should be the goal, allowing for diverse perspectives and healthy debate to flourish in a democratic society.

在信息时代，审查者（censors）的角色变得越来越重要。这些个人或组织负责审查和控制信息流向公众。虽然有人认为审查者（censors）是保护社会免受有害内容侵害的必要措施，但也有人认为他们的行为可能导致言论自由和创造力的压制。这种安全与自由之间的紧张关系是当今围绕媒体和传播的许多辩论的核心。历史上，审查者（censors）以不同形式存在于不同文化中。例如，在古罗马，审查者的职位对于维护公民的道德标准至关重要。他们负责监督公众道德，甚至可以驱逐不符合这些标准的参议员。快进到现代，我们看到审查者（censors）在政府、学校和企业中运作，每个组织都有自己的一套指导方针和可接受内容的标准。互联网进一步复杂化了审查的格局。随着社交媒体平台的兴起，审查者（censors）的权力发生了转变。像Facebook和Twitter这样的公司雇用自己的审查者（censors）团队来监控用户生成的内容，这常常导致偏见和不一致的指责。例如，一条被某个审查者（censors）认为不恰当的帖子，可能会被另一个允许，这造成了用户的困惑和沮丧。这种不一致引发了关于谁有权决定公共话语中什么是可接受的问题。此外，审查者（censors）的影响不仅限于单个帖子。它塑造了社会参与的整体叙事。当某些主题不断被压制时，可能会创造出一个关键讨论被窒息的环境。这在专制政权中尤为明显，审查者（censors）控制媒体，以确保只有政府批准的信息被传播。结果是一个缺乏信息的公众，无法就紧迫问题进行有意义的对话。另一方面，审查制度的支持者则认为，审查者（censors）在保护个人免受有害或误导性信息方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在涉及仇恨言论、虚假信息或图形内容的情况下，审查者（censors）可以作为公众安全的守护者。例如，在公共卫生危机期间，审查者（censors）可能会努力删除可能危及生命的虚假信息。因此，挑战在于找到维持言论自由与确保公众安全之间的平衡。总之，审查者（censors）在我们社会中的角色是复杂而多面的。在我们穿越不断演变的媒体景观时，批判性地审视审查对我们自由和社会规范的影响至关重要。虽然审查者（censors）可以发挥保护作用，但我们必须保持警惕，防止滥用以及开放对话的重要性。最终，培养一个知情和参与的公民社会应是目标，让多元的观点和健康的辩论在民主社会中蓬勃发展。