nominal damage

简明释义

象征性损失

英英释义

例句

1.After the storm passed, we assessed the property and found only nominal damage.

暴风雨过后，我们评估了财产，只发现了名义上的损害。

2.The car accident resulted in nominal damage to the bumper.

这起车祸导致保险杠只受到了名义上的损害。

3.Fortunately, the fire caused nominal damage to the building's exterior.

幸运的是，火灾对建筑外部造成了名义上的损害。

4.The tenant reported nominal damage to the apartment after moving out.

租户在搬出后报告了公寓的名义上的损害。

5.The company decided to settle the lawsuit for nominal damage rather than go to trial.

公司决定以名义上的损害和解诉讼，而不是上法庭。

作文

In the realm of law and insurance, the term nominal damage refers to a minimal amount of money awarded to a plaintiff in a lawsuit when a legal wrong has occurred, but no substantial harm or loss can be proven. This concept is crucial for understanding how courts address cases where the damage is more symbolic than financial. For instance, if someone breaches a contract but the other party suffers no real loss, the court may still award a small sum as nominal damage to acknowledge the breach. The purpose of awarding nominal damage is not to compensate the victim for losses but to recognize that a legal right was violated. This serves both as a moral victory for the plaintiff and as a deterrent against future violations. The idea is that even minor infractions deserve judicial acknowledgment, ensuring that individuals and organizations are held accountable for their actions.Consider a hypothetical scenario where a tenant is wrongfully evicted from a rental property without any physical or financial loss incurred. The tenant could sue the landlord for the wrongful eviction. If the court finds that the eviction was indeed unlawful, it may award the tenant nominal damage, perhaps a token sum like one dollar. This ruling would affirm the tenant's rights and send a message to the landlord that such actions are unacceptable, even if the tenant did not suffer significant losses.In many legal systems, nominal damage plays an essential role in the enforcement of rights. It allows individuals to seek justice without needing to prove extensive damages, which can sometimes be difficult or impossible to quantify. This aspect of the law encourages people to pursue claims that they might otherwise abandon due to the complexity of proving actual damages. Moreover, nominal damage can also serve as a foundation for further claims. In some instances, if a plaintiff can establish that they suffered nominal damage, they may also be able to claim additional damages, such as punitive damages, especially if the defendant's conduct was particularly egregious. This layered approach to justice helps to ensure that legal protections are robust and that individuals are not deterred from seeking redress.In conclusion, nominal damage is a fundamental concept in legal practice that signifies the recognition of a legal wrong without the necessity of proving significant harm. It underscores the importance of accountability and the protection of rights in both personal and commercial contexts. Understanding this term not only enhances one's comprehension of legal proceedings but also highlights the broader implications of justice and moral responsibility within society. As we navigate through various legal landscapes, the significance of nominal damage remains a vital component of the dialogue surrounding rights and reparations.

在法律和保险领域，术语名义损害指的是在诉讼中判给原告的一小笔钱，当发生了法律错误但无法证明实质性伤害或损失时。这个概念对于理解法院如何处理损害仅为象征性的案件至关重要。例如，如果有人违反合同，但另一方没有遭受任何实际损失，法院仍可能判给一小笔钱作为名义损害以承认这一违约行为。判给名义损害的目的是并不是为了补偿受害者的损失，而是为了承认法律权利被侵犯。这既是原告的道德胜利，也是对未来违规行为的威慑。其思想是，即使是微小的侵权行为也应得到司法的承认，以确保个人和组织对其行为负责。考虑一个假设场景，其中一名租户在没有遭受任何身体或财务损失的情况下被不当驱逐。如果租户起诉房东因不当驱逐而造成的损失，法院如果发现驱逐确实不合法，可能会判给租户名义损害，例如象征性的一美元。这一裁决将确认租户的权利，并向房东发出信息，表明此类行为是不可接受的，即使租户没有遭受重大损失。在许多法律体系中，名义损害发挥着重要作用。它允许个人在不需要证明重大损害的情况下寻求正义，这在某些情况下可能很难或根本无法量化。这一法律方面鼓励人们追求他们可能因证明实际损害的复杂性而放弃的索赔。此外，名义损害还可以作为进一步索赔的基础。在某些情况下，如果原告能够证明他们遭受了名义损害，那么他们也可能能够要求额外的损害赔偿，例如惩罚性损害赔偿，尤其是在被告的行为特别恶劣的情况下。这种法律救济的分层方法有助于确保法律保护的稳健性，确保个人不被阻止寻求赔偿。总之，名义损害是法律实践中的一个基本概念，意味着在不需要证明重大伤害的情况下对法律错误的认可。它强调了在个人和商业环境中问责制和权利保护的重要性。理解这个术语不仅增强了人们对法律程序的理解，还突显了在社会中正义和道德责任的更广泛影响。在我们穿越各种法律领域时，名义损害的重要性仍然是围绕权利和赔偿对话的关键组成部分。