inconvincible
简明释义
英[ˌɪnkənˈvɪnsəbəl]美[ˌɪnkənˈvɪnsəbl]
adj. 难以说服人的;无法使人信服的
英英释义
Incapable of being conquered or overcome; impossible to defeat. | 不可征服或克服的;不可能被击败的。 |
单词用法
不可辩驳的论点 | |
不可否认的证据 | |
保持不可说服 | |
似乎不可说服 |
同义词
不屈不挠的 | 她是一位不屈不挠的人权倡导者。 | ||
不屈服的 | 他在反对该提案的立场上保持不屈服。 | ||
坚定的 | 她坚定的精神激励了周围的每一个人。 | ||
不妥协的 | 这位不妥协的谈判者拒绝妥协。 |
反义词
可以说服的 | 在新想法面前,她是相当容易说服的。 | ||
易于说服的 | His arguments were so strong that they made her persuadable. | 他的论点如此有力,以至于让她变得易于说服。 |
例句
1.One of the reasons lies in normative logic itself, such as in its paradox orin its inconvincible system.
原因之一在于规范逻辑本身,例如其悖论或难以信服的系统。
2.One of the reasons lies in normative logic itself, such as in its paradox orin its inconvincible system.
原因之一在于规范逻辑本身,例如其悖论或难以信服的系统。
3.Despite the evidence presented, his belief remained inconvincible.
尽管有证据呈现,他的信念依然是不可动摇的。
4.Her argument was so strong that it seemed inconvincible to anyone who heard it.
她的论点如此强有力,以至于听到的人都觉得它是不可动摇的。
5.His faith in the project was inconvincible, even when others doubted.
他对这个项目的信心是不可动摇的,即使其他人表示怀疑。
6.To her, the love they shared felt inconvincible, no matter the challenges.
对她来说,他们之间的爱是不可动摇的,无论面临什么挑战。
7.The scientist's findings were inconvincible, leading to a paradigm shift in the field.
这位科学家的发现是不可动摇的,导致了该领域的范式转变。
作文
In the realm of philosophical debates, the term inconvincible often arises when discussing the nature of truth and belief. To be inconvincible means to be beyond the power of being convinced or persuaded; it describes a state where an individual holds steadfastly to their beliefs despite contrary evidence or arguments. This concept is particularly relevant in today's world, where misinformation can spread rapidly, leading to a populace that may become inconvincible in their views. Consider the current discourse surrounding climate change. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence supporting the reality of climate change and its anthropogenic causes, there remains a segment of the population that is inconvincible in their denial. They cling to outdated theories or conspiracy narratives, demonstrating how deeply held beliefs can resist even the most compelling data. This phenomenon is not just limited to climate change; it extends to various aspects of life, including politics, health, and social issues. The inconvincible nature of some beliefs can be traced back to cognitive biases that affect human reasoning. One such bias is confirmation bias, where individuals favor information that confirms their preexisting beliefs while disregarding information that contradicts them. This leads to a cycle of inconvincible thinking, where individuals become more entrenched in their views over time. As a result, discussions around contentious issues can become frustrating, as it seems nearly impossible to change the minds of those who are inconvincible. Moreover, the impact of social media cannot be understated in this context. Platforms like Facebook and Twitter create echo chambers where users are only exposed to viewpoints similar to their own. This environment fosters an inconvincible mindset, as individuals are rarely challenged by opposing perspectives. The algorithms that drive these platforms tend to promote content that generates engagement, often at the expense of factual accuracy. Therefore, it becomes increasingly difficult to have constructive dialogues with those who are inconvincible in their beliefs. To address the challenges posed by inconvincible thinking, it is essential to promote critical thinking and media literacy. Educating individuals on how to evaluate sources, recognize biases, and engage with differing viewpoints can help mitigate the effects of inconvincible beliefs. Additionally, fostering environments that encourage open-mindedness and respectful discourse can create opportunities for individuals to reconsider their positions. In conclusion, the concept of inconvincible beliefs is a significant barrier to understanding and collaboration in our increasingly polarized society. By recognizing the factors that contribute to this mindset and actively working to promote critical thinking, we can hope to bridge the divide and foster a more informed and open-minded populace. Ultimately, the goal is not to force agreement but to cultivate a culture where differing opinions can coexist, and perhaps, over time, even the inconvincible may find a path to reconsideration.
在哲学辩论的领域中,术语inconvincible经常出现在讨论真理和信仰的性质时。inconvincible意味着超出被说服或劝说的能力;它描述了一种状态,个体坚定地坚持自己的信念,尽管有相反的证据或论点。这一概念在当今世界尤其相关,因为错误信息可以迅速传播,导致公众在其观点上变得inconvincible。考虑一下当前围绕气候变化的讨论。尽管有压倒性的科学证据支持气候变化及其人类原因的现实,但仍然有一部分人群在否认这一事实方面是inconvincible的。他们坚持过时的理论或阴谋叙述,展示了根深蒂固的信念如何抵抗最有说服力的数据。这一现象不仅限于气候变化;它扩展到生活的各个方面,包括政治、健康和社会问题。某些信念的inconvincible特性可以追溯到影响人类推理的认知偏见。一个这样的偏见是确认偏见,即个人偏爱那些确认其先前信念的信息,而忽视与之相矛盾的信息。这导致了inconvincible思维的循环,个体随着时间的推移变得更加固执。因此,围绕争议问题的讨论可能变得令人沮丧,因为似乎几乎不可能改变那些在其信念上inconvincible的人的想法。此外,社交媒体的影响在这种情况下也不可低估。像Facebook和Twitter这样的平台创造了回音室,用户只接触到与自己相似的观点。这种环境滋养了inconvincible的心态,因为个体很少受到对立观点的挑战。推动这些平台的算法往往倾向于推广产生参与度的内容,通常以牺牲事实准确性为代价。因此,与那些在其信念上inconvincible的人进行建设性对话变得越来越困难。为了解决inconvincible思维带来的挑战,促进批判性思维和媒体素养至关重要。教育个体如何评估来源、识别偏见以及与不同观点互动,可以帮助减轻inconvincible信念的影响。此外,营造鼓励开放心态和尊重讨论的环境,可以为个体重新考虑自己的立场创造机会。总之,inconvincible信念的概念是我们日益两极化的社会中理解和合作的重大障碍。通过认识到促成这种心态的因素并积极推动批判性思维,我们希望能够弥合分歧,培养一个更具信息性和开放思想的公众。最终,目标不是强迫达成一致,而是培养一种不同意见共存的文化,也许,随着时间的推移,即使是inconvincible的人也能找到重新考虑的道路。