excessive damages

简明释义

损失数额过大

英英释义

例句

1.Many legal experts believe that the trend of awarding excessive damages in personal injury cases is detrimental to the justice system.

许多法律专家认为，在人身伤害案件中判决过高的赔偿金的趋势对司法系统是有害的。

2.The company appealed the decision, arguing that the excessive damages awarded would jeopardize its financial stability.

该公司对这一决定提出上诉，辩称判决的过高的赔偿金将危及其财务稳定。

3.In the case of the car accident, the court ruled that the claim for excessive damages was not supported by sufficient evidence.

在这起车祸案件中，法院裁定对过高的赔偿金的索赔缺乏足够的证据支持。

4.The defendant's lawyer argued that the jury's decision reflected a bias towards excessive damages rather than a fair assessment of the case.

被告的律师辩称，陪审团的决定反映了对过高的赔偿金的偏见，而不是对案件的公正评估。

5.The jury awarded the plaintiff excessive damages for emotional distress, which many believe were unjustified.

陪审团为原告的情感痛苦判决了过高的赔偿金，许多人认为这是没有根据的。

作文

In the realm of law, the term excessive damages refers to monetary compensation awarded to a plaintiff that is significantly higher than what is deemed reasonable or necessary to cover the losses incurred. This concept often arises in personal injury cases, contract disputes, and other legal matters where the court must determine the appropriate amount of compensation due to the injured party. Understanding excessive damages is crucial for both plaintiffs and defendants as it can greatly influence the outcome of a case and the financial implications for the parties involved.When a jury awards excessive damages, it typically does so out of sympathy for the plaintiff or a desire to punish the defendant for particularly egregious behavior. However, such awards can lead to significant legal challenges. Defendants may appeal the decision, arguing that the damages awarded are not proportional to the harm suffered. This is where the legal system steps in to review the case and determine if the damages awarded were indeed excessive.The issue of excessive damages also raises questions about fairness and justice within the legal system. On one hand, plaintiffs deserve to be compensated for their suffering and losses; on the other hand, defendants must be protected from arbitrary and unjust financial burdens. Courts often employ various standards and guidelines to assess whether the damages awarded are excessive. For instance, they may compare the award to similar cases, consider the severity of the injury, and evaluate the evidence presented during the trial.Moreover, the debate surrounding excessive damages is not only confined to the courtroom but also extends to public policy discussions. Critics argue that high damage awards can lead to increased insurance premiums and discourage businesses from taking risks, ultimately stifling innovation and economic growth. Proponents, however, contend that substantial damages are necessary to hold wrongdoers accountable and deter future misconduct.In recent years, some jurisdictions have enacted tort reform measures aimed at capping excessive damages. These reforms are intended to provide more predictable outcomes in personal injury cases and reduce the financial strain on defendants. However, they have also sparked controversy, with opponents claiming that such caps undermine the ability of victims to obtain full compensation for their injuries.In conclusion, excessive damages play a significant role in the legal landscape, affecting both the plaintiffs seeking justice and the defendants facing potential financial ruin. As society continues to grapple with the balance between fair compensation and protecting defendants from undue burdens, the discussion surrounding excessive damages will likely persist. Ultimately, achieving a fair resolution in legal disputes requires careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding each case and a commitment to upholding the principles of justice and equity.

在法律领域，术语过高的赔偿指的是授予原告的金钱赔偿，远远高于被认为合理或必要的金额，以弥补所遭受的损失。这个概念通常出现在人身伤害案件、合同纠纷和其他法律事务中，在这些案件中，法院必须确定应给予受害方的适当赔偿金额。理解过高的赔偿对原告和被告都至关重要，因为它可能会极大地影响案件的结果以及相关各方的财务后果。当陪审团授予过高的赔偿时，通常是出于对原告的同情或希望惩罚被告的特别恶劣行为。然而，这种裁决可能会导致重大的法律挑战。被告可能会对这一决定提出上诉，争辩说所授予的赔偿与所遭受的伤害不成比例。这时，法律系统介入，审查案件并确定所授予的赔偿是否确实过高。过高的赔偿问题还引发了关于法律系统公平和正义的问题。一方面，原告理应因其痛苦和损失而获得赔偿；另一方面，被告必须受到保护，以免承担任意和不公正的财务负担。法院通常采用各种标准和指导方针来评估所授予的赔偿是否过高。例如，他们可能会将该赔偿与类似案件进行比较，考虑伤害的严重性，并评估在审判期间提出的证据。此外，围绕过高的赔偿的辩论不仅限于法庭，还扩展到公共政策讨论。批评者认为，高额赔偿可能导致保险费用增加，并阻碍企业冒险，最终抑制创新和经济增长。然而，支持者则主张，巨额赔偿是为了让违法者承担责任并威慑未来的不当行为。近年来，一些司法管辖区实施了旨在限制过高的赔偿的侵权改革措施。这些改革旨在为人身伤害案件提供更可预测的结果，并减少对被告的财务压力。然而，它们也引发了争议，反对者声称，此类上限削弱了受害者获得全额赔偿的能力。总之，过高的赔偿在法律领域中扮演着重要角色，影响着寻求正义的原告和面临潜在财务破产的被告。随着社会继续努力平衡公平赔偿与保护被告免受不当负担之间的关系，围绕过高的赔偿的讨论可能会持续下去。最终，在法律争议中实现公平解决需要仔细考虑每个案件的具体情况，并致力于维护正义和公平的原则。