predatory pricing

简明释义

掠夺性定价

英英释义

例句

1.Regulators are investigating whether the new entrant is using predatory pricing to gain market share.

监管机构正在调查新进入者是否在使用掠夺性定价来获取市场份额。

2.To combat predatory pricing, many industries have established minimum price regulations.

为了应对掠夺性定价，许多行业已建立最低价格规定。

3.The company was accused of predatory pricing for selling its products below cost to eliminate competition.

该公司因以低于成本的价格销售产品以消除竞争而被指控为掠夺性定价。

4.Many small businesses struggle to survive when larger corporations engage in predatory pricing.

当大公司进行掠夺性定价时，许多小企业很难生存。

5.The lawsuit claimed that the retailer's predatory pricing practices harmed local competitors.

诉讼声称，该零售商的掠夺性定价行为损害了当地竞争对手。

作文

In the world of business, companies often engage in various pricing strategies to gain a competitive edge. One such strategy is known as predatory pricing, which involves setting prices extremely low with the intention of driving competitors out of the market. This practice can create a temporary monopoly for the company that employs it, allowing them to raise prices once their competition has been eliminated. While this strategy may seem beneficial for consumers in the short term due to lower prices, it can have detrimental effects on the market in the long run.The concept of predatory pricing is particularly relevant in industries where there are high fixed costs and the potential for economies of scale. For instance, large corporations may have the financial resources to absorb losses from low prices for an extended period, while smaller competitors might not be able to sustain such losses. As a result, these smaller companies may be forced to exit the market, leaving the larger company with increased market share and reduced competition.Moreover, predatory pricing can lead to a lack of innovation and diversity in the market. When a single company dominates the market, there is less incentive for them to improve their products or services. This stagnation can ultimately harm consumers, as they may be left with fewer choices and lower-quality options. Additionally, once the competition is eliminated and prices are raised, consumers may find themselves paying more than they would have if a competitive market had been maintained.Legally, predatory pricing is a contentious issue. In many jurisdictions, it is considered an anti-competitive practice and is subject to regulation. However, proving that a company is engaging in predatory pricing can be challenging. Authorities must demonstrate that the company intentionally set prices below cost with the aim of harming competition. This requires a thorough investigation into the company's pricing strategies and market behavior.Furthermore, the line between aggressive pricing and predatory pricing can often be blurred. Companies may argue that they are simply responding to market conditions or trying to attract customers with promotional pricing. This makes it difficult for regulators to take action against companies that may be engaging in borderline practices.In conclusion, while predatory pricing may offer short-term benefits for consumers, its long-term consequences can be harmful to the market and its participants. It leads to reduced competition, less innovation, and potentially higher prices in the future. As such, it is crucial for regulatory bodies to monitor pricing strategies closely and ensure that fair competition is maintained in the marketplace. Consumers should also be aware of the implications of predatory pricing and support policies that promote a healthy competitive environment. By doing so, we can help foster a market that benefits everyone in the long run.

在商业世界中，公司通常会采取各种定价策略以获得竞争优势。其中一种策略被称为掠夺性定价，它涉及将价格设定得极低，目的是将竞争对手驱逐出市场。这种做法可以为采用它的公司创造暂时的垄断地位，使他们能够在竞争对手被消灭后提高价格。虽然这种策略在短期内可能对消费者有利，因为价格较低，但从长远来看，它可能对市场产生不利影响。掠夺性定价的概念在固定成本高和规模经济潜力大的行业中特别相关。例如，大型公司可能拥有财务资源，可以在较长时间内承受低价带来的损失，而较小的竞争对手可能无法维持这样的损失。因此，这些小公司可能被迫退出市场，使得大型公司获得更大的市场份额和减少的竞争。此外，掠夺性定价可能导致市场缺乏创新和多样性。当单一公司主导市场时，他们就没有动力去改善产品或服务。这种停滞最终可能对消费者造成伤害，因为他们可能面临更少的选择和较低质量的选项。此外，一旦竞争被消灭，价格被提高，消费者可能发现自己支付的费用比在一个竞争市场中要高。在法律上，掠夺性定价是一个有争议的问题。在许多司法管辖区，它被视为反竞争行为，并受到监管。然而，证明一家公司正在进行掠夺性定价可能具有挑战性。有关当局必须证明该公司故意将价格设定在成本以下，目的是损害竞争。这需要对公司的定价策略和市场行为进行彻底调查。此外，激进定价和掠夺性定价之间的界限往往模糊不清。公司可能会辩称，他们只是在响应市场条件或试图通过促销定价吸引客户。这使得监管机构很难对可能参与边缘行为的公司采取行动。总之，虽然掠夺性定价可能为消费者提供短期利益，但其长期后果可能对市场及其参与者造成伤害。它导致竞争减少、创新降低以及未来可能更高的价格。因此，监管机构密切监控定价策略并确保市场中的公平竞争至关重要。消费者也应该意识到掠夺性定价的影响，并支持促进健康竞争环境的政策。通过这样做，我们可以帮助培养一个长期惠及所有人的市场。