bad paper; kite; fictitious paper

简明释义

空头票据

英英释义

例句

1.The bank refused to accept the kite 空头支票 that was presented at the counter.

银行拒绝接受柜台上提交的空头支票。

2.The accountant warned us not to invest in that company because they had a history of issuing bad paper 劣质票据.

会计师警告我们不要投资那家公司，因为他们有发行劣质票据的历史。

3.His reputation was damaged when it was discovered that he had been involved with bad paper 劣质票据 transactions.

当发现他参与了劣质票据交易时，他的声誉受到了损害。

4.After reviewing the documents, it became clear that several of them were fictitious papers 虚假文件 intended to mislead investors.

在审查文件后，很明显其中几个是为了误导投资者而准备的虚假文件。

5.Investors should be cautious of fictitious papers 虚假文件 that promise unrealistic returns.

投资者应对承诺不切实际回报的虚假文件保持警惕。

作文

In the world of academia, the integrity of research and publications is paramount. However, there are instances where scholars may find themselves dealing with what is known as bad paper（劣质论文）. This term refers to research that is poorly conducted, lacks rigor, or presents findings that are not reliable. The consequences of publishing bad paper can be far-reaching, affecting not only the credibility of the authors but also the broader academic community. It can mislead other researchers, waste resources, and ultimately hinder the progress of knowledge in a particular field.One particularly concerning trend in recent years is the emergence of kite（抄袭）. This term is often used to describe the practice of submitting papers that have been heavily plagiarized or copied from other works. In some cases, individuals may even go so far as to create entirely fabricated studies, leading to the classification of such works as fictitious paper（虚假论文）. This not only poses ethical dilemmas but also raises questions about the authenticity of research findings. When fictitious paper is published, it can distort the understanding of a topic and misinform future studies, creating a ripple effect that can last for years.The rise of online publication platforms has unfortunately made it easier for bad paper and fictitious paper to circulate. While these platforms offer opportunities for researchers to share their work widely, they also lack the rigorous peer-review processes that traditional journals enforce. As a result, papers that do not meet acceptable standards can be published and disseminated, contributing to the overall degradation of academic quality.To combat these issues, many institutions are now focusing on promoting research integrity and encouraging transparency in the research process. This includes providing training on proper research methodologies, citation practices, and the importance of originality. By educating researchers on the dangers of bad paper, kite, and fictitious paper, we can foster an environment where high-quality, trustworthy research is the norm rather than the exception.Furthermore, journals and academic societies are increasingly implementing stricter guidelines and checks for submissions. This includes the use of plagiarism detection software and the requirement for data sharing to verify results. By holding authors accountable for their work and ensuring that all research is conducted ethically, we can begin to reduce the prevalence of bad paper and fictitious paper in the academic world.In conclusion, the issues of bad paper, kite, and fictitious paper are significant challenges that the academic community must address. By fostering a culture of integrity and accountability, we can help ensure that research remains a credible and valuable pursuit. It is essential for researchers, institutions, and publishers to work together to uphold the standards of academic excellence and protect the integrity of scholarly communication.

在学术界，研究和出版的诚信至关重要。然而，有时学者们会发现自己面临所谓的劣质论文。这个术语指的是那些研究方法不严谨、缺乏可靠性的研究。发表劣质论文的后果可能是深远的，不仅影响作者的信誉，还影响更广泛的学术社区。它可能误导其他研究人员，浪费资源，并最终阻碍特定领域知识的进步。近年来，一个特别令人担忧的趋势是出现了抄袭。这个术语通常用来描述提交大量抄袭或复制他人作品的论文的行为。在某些情况下，个人甚至可能完全伪造研究，导致此类工作被归类为虚假论文。这不仅带来了伦理困境，还引发了关于研究结果真实性的问题。当虚假论文被发表时，它可能扭曲对某一主题的理解，并误导未来的研究，产生持续多年的连锁反应。在线出版平台的兴起不幸地使得劣质论文和虚假论文的传播变得更加容易。虽然这些平台为研究人员提供了广泛分享其工作的机会，但它们也缺乏传统期刊所实施的严格同行评审流程。因此，未达到可接受标准的论文可能会被发表和传播，从而导致学术质量整体下降。为了应对这些问题，许多机构现在正专注于促进研究诚信，鼓励研究过程的透明度。这包括提供关于正确研究方法、引用实践和原创性重要性的培训。通过教育研究人员了解劣质论文、抄袭和虚假论文的危险，我们可以营造一个高质量、可信赖的研究环境，使之成为常态，而不是例外。此外，期刊和学术协会越来越多地实施更严格的投稿指南和检查。这包括使用剽窃检测软件和要求共享数据以验证结果。通过让作者对自己的工作负责，并确保所有研究都以伦理方式进行，我们可以开始减少学术界劣质论文和虚假论文的流行。总之，劣质论文、抄袭和虚假论文的问题是学术界必须面对的重要挑战。通过培养诚信和问责的文化，我们可以帮助确保研究保持可信和有价值的追求。研究人员、机构和出版商必须共同努力，以维护学术卓越的标准，保护学术交流的诚信。