bloodletting
简明释义
n. 杀戮;放血疗法;血洗;内讧;裁员;(同组织内两队之间发生的)互不相让的激烈争吵
v. 流血;放血(bloodlet的现在分词)
英英释义
单词用法
政治上的冲突 | |
仪式性放血 | |
放血实践 | |
历史上的放血 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.Others had survived only by dint of huge bloodletting: IBM sacked 122,000 people, a quarter of its workforce, between 1990 and 1995.
其他公司仅靠拼杀幸存了下来:IBM在1990 - 1995年间解雇了公司员工的四分之一,达12.2万人。
2.For many, one issue was clear: bloodletting was a sound medical procedure.
对许多人来说,一个问题是明确的:放血疗法是一个很好的医疗手段。
3.Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of Xiaocuo decoction and ear acupoint bloodletting on acne vulgaris.
目的观察消痤饮配合耳穴放血治疗寻常痤疮的临床疗效。
4.Hopefully a satisfactory solution can be reached without much bloodletting.
希望不需要经过激烈的争吵就可以达成令人满意的解决方案。
5.His doctor prescribed starvation and bloodletting, which only exaggerated his symptoms.
医生给他开的处方是饥饿疗法和放血疗法,结果却只是加剧了他的症状。
6.Which means that mice may be more likely to survive a bloodletting-pecking.
这就意味着小白鼠更可能在浴血肉搏中幸存下来。
7.Some modern alternative medicine practitioners still believe in the benefits of bloodletting.
一些现代替代医学从业者仍然相信放血的好处。
8.The patient's condition worsened after unnecessary bloodletting was performed.
在进行不必要的放血后,患者的病情恶化了。
9.The ancient practice of bloodletting was believed to cure various ailments.
古代的放血疗法被认为可以治愈各种疾病。
10.Historically, bloodletting was thought to balance the body's humors.
历史上,人们认为放血可以平衡身体的体液。
11.In medieval times, doctors often resorted to bloodletting as a common treatment method.
在中世纪,医生们常常采用放血作为一种常见的治疗方法。
作文
The concept of bloodletting has a rich history that dates back to ancient civilizations. It was once a common medical practice believed to cure various ailments by removing blood from the body. In those times, doctors thought that many diseases were caused by an imbalance of the four humors: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile. As a result, bloodletting became a go-to treatment for everything from headaches to fevers. The practice involved using instruments like leeches or lancets to draw blood, often leading to more harm than good.Despite its historical significance, the practice of bloodletting is now viewed as archaic and ineffective. Modern medicine has evolved significantly, relying on scientific research and evidence-based practices. The understanding of human anatomy and physiology has advanced, making it clear that removing blood does not cure illness but can actually lead to complications such as anemia and shock.In contemporary discussions, the term bloodletting has also taken on a metaphorical meaning. It is often used to describe situations where there is a significant loss or sacrifice, particularly in political or social contexts. For example, one might refer to a company downsizing its workforce as a bloodletting of talent, indicating a painful reduction that impacts both the employees and the organization as a whole.Furthermore, bloodletting can symbolize the emotional toll of conflict or tragedy. In literature and art, the imagery associated with bloodletting evokes feelings of loss, suffering, and the harsh realities of life. It serves as a reminder of the sacrifices made in the pursuit of goals or ideals, whether they be personal, communal, or national.In recent years, the term has been applied to various societal issues, such as the bloodletting of resources in times of war or economic crisis. Communities often face the grim reality of losing their youth, culture, and vitality due to ongoing conflicts or systemic injustices. This modern interpretation of bloodletting highlights the need for healing and restoration, as societies work to overcome the scars left by violence and division.Ultimately, the evolution of the term bloodletting from a physical medical procedure to a powerful metaphor illustrates the complexity of human experience. It invites us to reflect on the ways we cope with loss and the importance of finding healthier alternatives to address our problems. Just as the medical community moved away from bloodletting in favor of more effective treatments, society must seek out constructive solutions to heal wounds and promote well-being.In conclusion, bloodletting serves as a poignant reminder of our past and a call to action for our future. Whether in the context of health, politics, or personal relationships, understanding the implications of bloodletting can guide us towards more compassionate and effective approaches to the challenges we face. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, let us remember the lessons learned from history and strive for healing rather than harm.
“放血”这一概念有着悠久的历史,可以追溯到古代文明。它曾是一种常见的医学实践,被认为通过从体内抽取血液来治愈各种疾病。在那个时代,医生认为许多疾病是由四种体液的不平衡引起的:血液、痰液、黑胆汁和黄胆汁。因此,“放血”成为治疗头痛、发烧等症状的常用方法。这一过程涉及使用水蛭或小刀等工具抽取血液,往往导致更多的伤害而非好处。尽管其历史意义重大,但如今“放血”这一做法被视为过时且无效。现代医学已经显著发展,依赖科学研究和循证实践。对人体解剖学和生理学的理解不断进步,使人们明确认识到,抽取血液并不能治愈疾病,反而可能导致贫血和休克等并发症。在当代讨论中,“放血”一词也赋予了隐喻的意义。它经常被用来描述在政治或社会背景下发生的重大损失或牺牲。例如,人们可能将一家公司裁员称为人才的“放血”,这表明这种痛苦的减少影响了员工和整个组织。此外,“放血”还可以象征冲突或悲剧的情感代价。在文学和艺术中,与“放血”相关的意象唤起了失落、痛苦和生活的严酷现实。它提醒我们,在追求目标或理想的过程中所做出的牺牲,无论是个人、群体还是国家。近年来,这个术语被应用于各种社会问题,例如在战争或经济危机时期资源的“放血”。社区常常面临因持续冲突或系统性不公而失去年轻人、文化和活力的严峻现实。这种对“放血”的现代解释突显了治愈和恢复的必要性,因为社会努力克服暴力和分裂留下的伤痕。最终,“放血”这一术语从一种物理医疗程序演变为一种强有力的隐喻,体现了人类经历的复杂性。它邀请我们反思应对损失的方式,以及寻找更健康的替代方案来解决问题的重要性。正如医学界逐渐摒弃“放血”而转向更有效的治疗方法,社会也必须寻求建设性的解决方案,以治愈创伤并促进福祉。总之,“放血”是我们过去的深刻提醒,也是对未来的呼吁。无论是在健康、政治还是个人关系的背景下,理解“放血”的含义可以指引我们朝着更具同情心和有效的方法来应对面临的挑战。在这个日益复杂的世界中,让我们铭记历史教训,努力追求治愈而非伤害。